Too much crime is blamed on the tool, not the person. How will you protect law abiding citizens to protect themselves.
The text of the 2nd Amendment is clear, and the Supreme Court has ruled that it is an individual right.
In 2005, SCOTUS ruled that police do not have to respond to 911 calls and each individual is responsible to protect their self and family. The second amendment gives them the means to do so..
Each day our Second Amendment rights are infringed upon more and more. First the ban of fully automatic firearms, and now they want to ban semi automatic firearms and even guns with certain features.
The next president will appoint one or more supreme court judges, sign executive orders and work with congress on gun control. How will you protect the second amendment during this process?
The Constitution is very specific on the wording of the second amendment.
Then you also agree that any/all laws passed regarding the 2nd are null and void because our right shall not be infringed upon. This was so that we the people could defend against a tyrannical govt.
It's proven, most injuries and deaths caused by guns are committed by criminals. These criminals are linked to gangs, or other life-long violence trends. We can't allow them to influence laws for all
Some people do not respect human life,firearms, or cars for that matter. Why should the law abiding citizens pay for this by way of more laws, banning,ect.
The right to own and bear arms is clearly spelled out in the 2nd Amendment. The government currently heavily infringes this right. What will you do to remove those harmful infringements?
"The greatest danger to american freedom is a government that ignores the constitution." Thomas Jefferson. " I ask Sir, what is the Milita? It is the whole people". George Mason.
Often the high road seems impassable in today's political climate. What is your approach towards compromise?
Both candidates seem to agree that every child should have the opportunity to achieve his potential. Do you agree or disagree that this is inconsistent with not allowing a child to be born? Why?